Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - compare

Compare tractors: Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A compare - general information

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Brand Belarus Case IH
Model Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Series n.d. Farmall A
Previous model
Next model
Smaller Case IH Farmall 45A
Larger Case IH Farmall 65A
Years from 1992 to 1996 y. from 2010 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Belarus 572 reviews New! Case IH Farmall 55A reviews New!

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - performance

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Maximum power (HP / kW) 65 KM (48.5 kW) n.d.
Engine RPM 1800 rpm 2700 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - engine

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Belarus n.d.
Engine model Belarus D-242 ISM
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.8 l. 2.216 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 4
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 110 mm 84 mm
Stroke 125 mm 100 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - turbocharger

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Turbocharger No Yes
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable No
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - electronics

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Supply voltage starter (V) 24 V 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - PTO

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - brakes

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes Yes
Brake type disc brakes, dry brakes, mechanical disc brakes, wet brakes, mechanical
Discs Single Single

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - dimensions

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Weight from 4148 kg to 4729 kg (depending by model) from 1710 kg to 1989 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length 3929 mm n.d.
Height n.d. 2385 mm
Width 1971 mm 1679 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. from 1450 mm to 1844 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1435 mm to 1841 mm
Wheelbase 2450 mm n.d.
Front tires 11.2-20 n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - drive

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - hydraulics

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed No n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - transmission

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 9 8
Reverse gears 2 8
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 55A - equipment

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 55A
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.