Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Brand Case IH Claas
Model Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller Claas Axion 810
Larger Claas Axion 830
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 210 reviews New! Claas Axion 820 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Maximum power (HP / kW) 238 KM (175 kW) 209 KM (153.67647058824 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 410 l. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. 50 km / h

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. DEUTZ Power Systems
Engine model n.d. DPS
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 6.788 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. n.d.
Stroke n.d. n.d.
Maximum torque 866 Nm / rpm n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Turbocharger No Yes (Turbo Diesel engine)
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable Yes
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. n.d.
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) n.d. n.d.
Battery, qty n.d. n.d.
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
PTO min 540/540E rpm 540/540E rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm 1000/1000E rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. n.d.
Discs

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Weight from 6850 kg (depending by model) from 7238 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 6850 kg 7238 kg
Length 4449 mm 5721 mm
Height 2985-3040 mm 3153 mm
Width 2682 mm n.d.
Clearance n.d. 516 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1560 mm to 2269 mm n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 28840 mm 29850 mm
Front tires 480 / 70 R28; 540 / 65 R28 16.9R28
Rear tires 580 / 70 R38; 650 / 65 R38 n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight 12000 kg 12000 kg
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Three-point hitch 3900 kg 9460 / 9460 kg
Three-point hitch type piston, adjustable draft and positional n.d.
Three-point hitch performance 113-150 l / min 150 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure 21.5 MPa n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow Yes Yes
Constant pressure Yes No
Control system flow-compensated flow-compensated
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears n.d. 24
Reverse gears n.d. 24
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 820 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 820
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.