Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - compare
Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 compare - general information
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Case IH | New Holland |
| Model | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | – | – |
| Next model | – | – |
| Smaller | – | – |
| Larger | – | – |
| Years | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Case IH Puma 210 reviews New! | New Holland TM 190 reviews New! |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - performance
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 238 KM (175 kW) | 193.12 KM (142 kW) |
| Engine RPM | 2200 rpm | n.d. |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | 410 l. | n.d. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - engine
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Engine model | n.d. | n.d. |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 6.7 l. | 7.5 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | n.d. | n.d. |
| Stroke | n.d. | n.d. |
| Maximum torque | 866 Nm / rpm | n.d. |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | piston pump, direct fuel injection |
| Injectors | n.d. | multi holes injector |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forced cooling | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooler | ||
| Thermostat | ||
| Cooler type | ||
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - turbocharger
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | No | Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) |
| Dual turbocharger | Not applicable | No |
| Intercooler | Not applicable | Yes |
| Aftercooler | Not applicable | No |
| Wastegate valve | Not applicable | No |
| Variable geometry | Not applicable | No |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - electronics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ground | n.d. | n.d. |
| Battery (V) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Battery, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Charging system | Generator | Generator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Manual |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - PTO
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO min | 540/540E rpm | |
| PTO max | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO rpm | n.d. | |
| PTO control | manual | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - brakes
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | No | No |
| Brake type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Discs | – | – |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - dimensions
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | from 6850 kg (depending by model) | n.d. |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | 6850 kg | n.d. |
| Length | 4449 mm | n.d. |
| Height | 2985-3040 mm | n.d. |
| Width | 2682 mm | n.d. |
| Clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | from 1560 mm to 2269 mm | n.d. |
| Rear track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | 28840 mm | n.d. |
| Front tires | 480 / 70 R28; 540 / 65 R28 | n.d. |
| Rear tires | 580 / 70 R38; 650 / 65 R38 | n.d. |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | 12000 kg | n.d. |
| Turning radius | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - drive
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | (depending by model) | (depending by model) |
| Additional | ||
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | n.d. | n.d. |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | n/a | n/a |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n/a | n/a |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | – | – |
| Crawler drive | No | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | No | No |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - hydraulics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | 3900 kg | 8647 kg |
| Three-point hitch type | piston, adjustable draft and positional | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch performance | 113-150 l / min | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch pressure | 21.5 MPa | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | n.d. | n.d. |
| Central | No | No |
| Constant flow | Yes | Yes |
| Constant pressure | Yes | No |
| Control system | flow-compensated | n.d. |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - transmission
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | n/a | n/a |
| PowerShift | No | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | – | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | n.d. | 18 |
| Reverse gears | n.d. | 6 |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs New Holland TM 190 - equipment
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | New Holland TM 190 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |