Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C compare - general information

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Brand Case IH Challenger
Model Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Challenger MT975B
Next model
Smaller Challenger MT965C
Larger
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Steiger 620 reviews New! Challenger MT975C reviews New!

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - performance

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Maximum power (HP / kW) 628 KM (462 kW) 585 KM (436.2 kW)
Engine RPM n.d. n.d.
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 1720 l. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - engine

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. Caterpillar
Engine model n.d. Caterpillar C18 ACERT
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 12.9 l. 18.131 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. 145 mm
Stroke n.d. 183 mm
Maximum torque 2941 Nm / 1400 rpm n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Turbocharger No Yes
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable No
Aftercooler Not applicable Yes
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - electronics

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. n.d.
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - PTO

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
PTO rpm n.d. 1000 rpm
PTO control n.d. manual

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - brakes

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. n.d.
Discs

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - dimensions

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Weight from 21012 kg to 22828 kg (depending by model) n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 21012 kg n.d.
Length 7615 mm 7569 mm
Height 3772 mm n.d.
Width 3048 mm 5080 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase n.d. 3940 mm
Front tires 710 / 70 R42 (standard) 710/70R42
Rear tires 710 / 70 R42 (standard) n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius 5.1 - 5.7 m n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - drive

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension Yes
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Three-point hitch 8900 kg n.d.
Three-point hitch type piston, adjustable draft and positional n.d.
Three-point hitch performance 159 l / min n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure 21 MPa n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. Yes
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. flow-compensated
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - transmission

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears n.d. 16
Reverse gears n.d. 4
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Steiger 620 vs Challenger MT975C - equipment

Specs Case IH Steiger 620 Challenger MT975C
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.