Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Brand Case IH Claas
Model Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller Case IH Puma 125
Larger Case IH Puma 155
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 140 reviews New! Claas Arion 650 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Maximum power (HP / kW) n.d. 184 KM (135 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2000 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. 50 km / h

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer CNH DEUTZ Power Systems
Engine model CNH n.d.
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 6.788 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm n.d.
Stroke 132 mm n.d.
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine n.d.
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Turbocharger Yes No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler No Not applicable
Aftercooler No Not applicable
Wastegate valve No Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V n.d.
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Alternator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
PTO rpm 540 rpm n.d.
PTO control manual n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic n.d.
Discs Single

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Weight from 6001 kg to 6225 kg (depending by model) from 6820 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 6820 kg
Length n.d. 4818 mm
Height n.d. 3019 mm
Width n.d. n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1570 mm to 2266 mm n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2730 mm 28200 mm
Front tires n.d. n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. 12000 kg
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Three-point hitch n.d. 7500 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. piston, adjustable draft and positional
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 110 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift Yes No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 19 24
Reverse gears 6 24
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 140 vs Claas Arion 650 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 140 Claas Arion 650
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.