Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Brand Case IH John Deere
Model Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Case IH Puma 180 –
Next model – –
Smaller Case IH Puma 170 John Deere 7820
Larger Case IH Puma 200 –
Years n.d. from 2003 to 2006 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 185 reviews New! John Deere 7920 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Maximum power (HP / kW) 182 KM (135.7 kW) n.d.
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2100 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. n.d.
Engine model CNH John Deere
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.485 l. 8.179 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm 116 mm
Stroke 132 mm 129 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Turbocharger Yes Yes
Dual turbocharger No No
Intercooler No Yes
Aftercooler No No
Wastegate valve No No
Variable geometry No No
Additional parameters – –

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground negative ground negative ground
Battery (V) 12 V 12 V
Battery, qty 1 1
Charging system Alternator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Electric Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic
Discs – Single

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Weight n.d. from 8131 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. 5390 mm
Height n.d. 3185 mm
Width n.d. 2438 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1524 mm to 2235 mm n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2880 mm 2860 mm
Front tires n.d. 420/90R30
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension – –
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift Yes No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting –
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) unlimited (ranges: - 1)
Reverse gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) unlimited (ranges: - 1)
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 185 vs John Deere 7920 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 185 John Deere 7920
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.