Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Brand Case IH Massey Ferguson
Model Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Case IH Puma 195
Next model
Smaller Case IH Puma 185 Massey Ferguson 6497
Larger Case IH Puma 215
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 200 reviews New! Massey Ferguson 6499 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Maximum power (HP / kW) 197 KM (146.9 kW) n.d.
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. SisuDiesel
Engine model CNH SisuDiesel 74 CTA
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.485 l. 7.4 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm 108 mm
Stroke 132 mm 134 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Turbocharger Yes Yes
Dual turbocharger No No
Intercooler No No
Aftercooler No No
Wastegate valve No No
Variable geometry No No
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V 12 V
Battery, qty 1 1
Charging system Alternator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Electric Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic
Discs Single

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Weight n.d. n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. 5435 mm
Height n.d. n.d.
Width n.d. 2494 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1524 mm to 2235 mm from 1524 mm to 2235 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1524 mm to 3023 mm
Wheelbase 2880 mm 2990 mm
Front tires n.d. n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift Yes Yes
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) 24
Reverse gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) 24
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 200 vs Massey Ferguson 6499 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 200 Massey Ferguson 6499
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.