Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - compare
Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 compare - general information
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Case IH | McCormick Intl |
| Model | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | – | – |
| Next model | Case IH Puma 215 | – |
| Smaller | Case IH Puma 195 | – |
| Larger | Case IH Puma 225 | – |
| Years | from 2007 to 2010 y. | n.d. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Case IH Puma 210 reviews New! | McCormick Intl XTX215 reviews New! |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - performance
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 210 KM (156.6 kW) | 193 KM (143.9 kW) |
| Engine RPM | 2200 rpm | 2200 rpm |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - engine
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | CNH | Iveco |
| Engine model | CNH | Iveco |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 6.7 l. | 6.7 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | 104 mm | 104 mm |
| Stroke | 132 mm | 132 mm |
| Maximum torque | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injectors | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | liquid cooled engine | liquid cooled engine |
| Forced cooling | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooler | Yes | Yes |
| Thermostat | Yes | Yes |
| Cooler type | tubular-plate cooler | tubular-plate cooler |
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - turbocharger
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | Yes | Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) |
| Dual turbocharger | No | No |
| Intercooler | Yes | No |
| Aftercooler | No | No |
| Wastegate valve | No | No |
| Variable geometry | No | No |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - electronics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | 12 V | 12 V |
| Ground | negative ground | n.d. |
| Battery (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Battery, qty | 1 | n.d. |
| Charging system | Alternator | Generator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Manual |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - PTO
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO rpm | 540 rpm | 540 rpm |
| PTO control | manual | manual |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - brakes
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | Yes | No |
| Brake type | disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic | disc brakes, wet brakes |
| Discs | Single | Single |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - dimensions
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | from 7125 kg to 8126 kg (depending by model) | from 7262 kg to 9182 kg (depending by model) |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | n.d. | n.d. |
| Length | n.d. | 5308 mm |
| Height | n.d. | 3023 mm |
| Width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2870 mm |
| Front tires | n.d. | 540/65R30 |
| Rear tires | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | n.d. | n.d. |
| Turning radius | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - drive
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) | 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) |
| Additional | all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle | all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle |
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | Yes | Yes |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | Yes | Yes |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n.d., AWD drive | n.d., AWD drive |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | – | – |
| Crawler drive | No | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | Yes | Yes |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - hydraulics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch performance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | n.d. | n.d. |
| Central | No | No |
| Constant flow | No | No |
| Constant pressure | No | No |
| Control system | flow-compensated | flow-compensated |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - transmission
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | No, electro-hydraulic control | n/a |
| PowerShift | Yes | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | unlimited (ranges: - 1) | 48 |
| Reverse gears | unlimited (ranges: - 1) | 40 |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 210 vs McCormick Intl XTX215 - equipment
| Specs | Case IH Puma 210 | McCormick Intl XTX215 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |