Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - compare
Compare tractors: Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 compare - general information
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Caterpillar | Claas |
| Model | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | – | – |
| Next model | – | – |
| Smaller | Challenger 85E | – |
| Larger | – | – |
| Years | from 1998 to 2001 y. | n.d. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Challenger 95E reviews New! | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 reviews New! |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - performance
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 410 KM (305.7 kW) | 388 KM (285.29411764706 kW) |
| Engine RPM | 2100 rpm | n.d. |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | 50 km / h |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - engine
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | n.d. | Caterpillar |
| Engine model | Caterpillar | Caterpillar C13 |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 11.945 l. | 12.5 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | 130 mm | n.d. |
| Stroke | 150 mm | n.d. |
| Maximum torque | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injectors | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | liquid cooled engine | n.d. |
| Forced cooling | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooler | Yes | |
| Thermostat | Yes | |
| Cooler type | tubular-plate cooler | |
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - turbocharger
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | Yes | No |
| Dual turbocharger | No | Not applicable |
| Intercooler | Yes | Not applicable |
| Aftercooler | No | Not applicable |
| Wastegate valve | No | Not applicable |
| Variable geometry | No | Not applicable |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - electronics
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Ground | n.d. | n.d. |
| Battery (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Battery, qty | 1 | n.d. |
| Charging system | Generator | Generator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Manual |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - PTO
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO rpm | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO min | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO max | n.d. | |
| PTO control | manual | manual |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - brakes
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | No | No |
| Brake type | disc brakes, hydraulic | n.d. |
| Discs | Single | – |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - dimensions
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | n.d. | from 17230 kg (depending by model) |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | n.d. | 17230 kg |
| Length | n.d. | 7493 mm |
| Height | n.d. | 3801 mm |
| Width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | 2710 mm | 35000 mm |
| Front tires | 25 | n.d. |
| Rear tires | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | n.d. | n.d. |
| Turning radius | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - drive
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | (depending by model) | (depending by model) |
| Additional | ||
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | n.d. | n.d. |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | n/a | n/a |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n/a | n/a |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | – | – |
| Crawler drive | Yes | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | No | No |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - hydraulics
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | n.d. | 13600 kg |
| Three-point hitch type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch performance | n.d. | 190 / 205 / 205 l / min |
| Three-point hitch pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | n.d. | n.d. |
| Central | No | No |
| Constant flow | No | No |
| Constant pressure | No | No |
| Control system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - transmission
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | No, electro-hydraulic control | n/a |
| PowerShift | Yes | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | 10 | n.d. |
| Reverse gears | 2 | n.d. |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 5000 C13 - equipment
| Specs | Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 5000 C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |