Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - compare
Compare tractors: Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 compare - general information
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Challenger | New Holland |
| Model | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | Challenger MT975B | – |
| Next model | – | – |
| Smaller | Challenger MT965C | – |
| Larger | – | – |
| Years | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Challenger MT975C reviews New! | New Holland T8.390 reviews New! |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - performance
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 585 KM (436.2 kW) | 374 KM (275 kW) |
| Engine RPM | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | n.d. | 651 l. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - engine
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | Caterpillar | PowerTech Engines |
| Engine model | Caterpillar C18 ACERT | PowerTech Cursor 9 |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 18.131 l. | 8.7 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | 4 |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | 145 mm | n.d. |
| Stroke | 183 mm | n.d. |
| Maximum torque | n.d. | 1671 Nm / rpm |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injectors | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | liquid cooled engine | n.d. |
| Forced cooling | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooler | Yes | |
| Thermostat | Yes | |
| Cooler type | tubular-plate cooler | |
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - turbocharger
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | Yes | No |
| Dual turbocharger | No | Not applicable |
| Intercooler | No | Not applicable |
| Aftercooler | Yes | Not applicable |
| Wastegate valve | No | Not applicable |
| Variable geometry | No | Not applicable |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - electronics
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ground | n.d. | n.d. |
| Battery (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Battery, qty | 1 | n.d. |
| Charging system | Alternator | Generator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Manual |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - PTO
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO rpm | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO min | 540 rpm | |
| PTO max | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO control | manual | manual |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - brakes
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | No | No |
| Brake type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Discs | – | – |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - dimensions
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | n.d. | n.d. |
| Length | 7569 mm | 6369 mm |
| Height | n.d. | 3368 mm |
| Width | 5080 mm | 2534 mm |
| Clearance | n.d. | 407 mm |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | 3940 mm | 34500 mm |
| Front tires | 710/70R42 | n.d. |
| Rear tires | n.d. | 800 / 70 R38 |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | n.d. | n.d. |
| Turning radius | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - drive
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | 4x4, 4WD (depending by model) | (depending by model) |
| Additional | all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full | |
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | Yes | n.d. |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | Yes | n/a |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n.d., AWD drive | n/a |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | Yes | – |
| Crawler drive | No | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | No | No |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - hydraulics
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | n.d. | 10200 kg |
| Three-point hitch type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch performance | n.d. | 161 / 274 l / min |
| Three-point hitch pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | Yes | n.d. |
| Central | Yes | No |
| Constant flow | No | No |
| Constant pressure | No | No |
| Control system | flow-compensated | n.d. |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - transmission
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | n/a | n/a |
| PowerShift | No | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | – | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | 16 | n.d. |
| Reverse gears | 4 | n.d. |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Challenger MT975C vs New Holland T8.390 - equipment
| Specs | Challenger MT975C | New Holland T8.390 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |