Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - compare

Compare tractors: Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M compare - general information

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Brand Ford Ursus
Model Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Series n.d. C
Previous model Ursus C-330
Next model Ford 2000 Ursus C-335
Smaller
Larger Ford 4000 Ursus C-360
Years from 1962 to 1965 y. from 1986 to 1993 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Ford 2000 reviews New! Ursus C-330M reviews New!

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - performance

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Maximum power (HP / kW) 36 KM (26.8 kW) 30 KM (22 kW)
Engine RPM 2000 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. 2,5 l/mth (1865 rpm)
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 35 l.
Max. speed n.d. 25,32 km / h

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - engine

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. Ursus
Engine model Ford Ursus S-312C
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 2.315 l. 1,96 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. 4
Cylinders 4 2
Compression n.d. 17:1
Bore 90 mm 102 mm
Stroke 91 mm 120 mm
Maximum torque n.d. 100 Nm / 1600-1800 rpm
Air filter n.d. wet air filter with cyclone
Fuel filter n.d. fuel filter with cartridge felt-paper
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. 2
Oil filter n.d. line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4
Oil pump n.d. gear pump
Speed control (control) n.d. mechanical
Injection pump n.d. piston pump with mechanical control
Injectors n.d. pintle injector spray
Injection pressure n.d. 13,2 MPa
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. Yes, cooling water pump
Cooler Yes Yes, with fan
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. 7 l.
Clutch n.d. friction clutch, single disc, dry, two-stage clutch

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - turbocharger

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - electronics

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground positive ground positive ground
Battery (V) n.d. 6 V
Battery, qty n.d. 2
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. Ursus
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. Yes
Cock lamp No No

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - PTO

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - brakes

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. mechanical
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. drum brakes, dry brakes, mechanical, independent, external brakes
Discs

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - dimensions

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Weight n.d. from 1675 kg to 2434 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 1944 kg
Length n.d. 3080 mm
Height n.d. 2070 mm
Width n.d. 1870 mm
Clearance n.d. 400-480 mm, adjustable clearance
Rear clearance n.d. adjustable
Front track width n.d. from 1350 mm to 1650 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1250 mm to 1850 mm
Wheelbase 1920 mm 1820 mm
Front tires 5.50-16 6.00-16
Rear tires n.d. 12.4-28 (standard); 11.2-28; 9.5-32
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. 5500 kg
Max. axle load n.d. 24,99 kN
Max. total weight n.d. 2240 kg
Turning radius n.d. 6,6 m

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - drive

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. mechanically locking differential
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. Yes
Rear planetary drives n.d. No
Front planetary drives n.d. No

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - hydraulics

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Three-point hitch n.d. 700 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. classic
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 20 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. 11-13,5 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed No Yes
Central Yes No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. gear pump
Two-section distributor n.d. No
Quick couplings n.d. 1
Auto Lift n.d. No

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - transmission

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Synchronous transmission n.d. No, non-synchronized
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a Yes
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 8 6
Reverse gears 2 2
Creeper n.d. No

Ford 2000 vs Ursus C-330M - equipment

Specs Ford 2000 Ursus C-330M
Clevis Yes (???) Yes
Lower catch n.d. Yes
Air conditioning n.d. No