Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - compare
Compare tractors: Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 compare - general information
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ford | Valmet |
| Model | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | – | – |
| Next model | Ford 8730 | – |
| Smaller | Ford TW-15 | – |
| Larger | Ford TW-35 | – |
| Years | from 1983 to 1989 y. | from 1995 to 2001 y. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Ford TW-25 reviews New! | Valmet 8050 reviews New! |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - performance
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 156 KM (116.3 kW) | 110 KM (82 kW) |
| Engine RPM | 2200 rpm | 2200 rpm |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - engine
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | Ford | Valmet |
| Engine model | Ford | Valmet |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 6.6 l. | 6.6 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | 112 mm | 108 mm |
| Stroke | 112 mm | 120 mm |
| Maximum torque | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injectors | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | liquid cooled engine | n.d. |
| Forced cooling | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooler | Yes | |
| Thermostat | Yes | |
| Cooler type | tubular-plate cooler | |
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - turbocharger
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | Yes | Yes |
| Dual turbocharger | No | No |
| Intercooler | No | No |
| Aftercooler | No | No |
| Wastegate valve | No | No |
| Variable geometry | No | No |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - electronics
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Ground | negative ground | n.d. |
| Battery (V) | 12 V | n.d. |
| Battery, qty | 1 | n.d. |
| Charging system | Alternator | Generator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Manual |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - PTO
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO rpm | 540 rpm | 540 rpm |
| PTO control | manual | manual |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - brakes
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | Yes | No |
| Brake type | disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic | n.d. |
| Discs | Single | – |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - dimensions
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | from 5564 kg to 8148 kg (depending by model) | n.d. |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | n.d. | n.d. |
| Length | 4547 mm | 4859 mm |
| Height | n.d. | 2840 mm |
| Width | 2123 mm | n.d. |
| Clearance | 417 mm | n.d. |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | from 1524 mm to 2134 mm | n.d. |
| Rear track width | from 1626 mm to 2540 mm | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | 2740 mm | 2560 mm |
| Front tires | 14x16 | 14.9R28 |
| Rear tires | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | n.d. | n.d. |
| Turning radius | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - drive
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) | 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) |
| Additional | one wheel drive | all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle |
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | n.d. | Yes |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | n/a | Yes |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n/a | n.d., AWD drive |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | – | – |
| Crawler drive | No | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | Yes | No |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - hydraulics
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch type | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch performance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Three-point hitch pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | n.d. | n.d. |
| Central | No | No |
| Constant flow | No | No |
| Constant pressure | No | No |
| Control system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - transmission
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | No, electro-hydraulic control | n/a |
| PowerShift | Yes | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | 24 | 36 |
| Reverse gears | 6 | 36 |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Ford TW-25 vs Valmet 8050 - equipment
| Specs | Ford TW-25 | Valmet 8050 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |