Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - compare

Compare tractors: Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A compare - general information

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Brand Massey Ferguson Ursus
Model Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Series n.d. C
Previous model Ursus C-360-3P
Next model Massey Ferguson 3060
Smaller Massey Ferguson 670 Ursus C-360 ('15)
Larger Massey Ferguson 698 Ursus C-3110
Years from 1983 to 1986 y. from 2015 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Massey Ferguson 690 reviews New! Ursus C-385A reviews New!

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - performance

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Maximum power (HP / kW) 90 KM (67.1 kW) 85 KM (62 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. 220 g/kWh ( rpm)
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 120 l.
Max. speed n.d. 40 km / h

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - engine

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Perkins Deutz
Engine model Perkins A4.248 Deutz TDC 3.6 EURO III B
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.1 l. 3,6 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. 4
Cylinders 4 4
Compression n.d. 18:1
Bore 101 mm 98 mm
Stroke 127 mm 120 mm
Maximum torque n.d. 358 Nm / 1600 rpm
Air filter n.d. dry air filter, two-stage, sensor contamination
Fuel filter n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. 2
Oil filter n.d. line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4
Oil pump n.d. gear pump
Speed control (control) n.d. mechanical
Injection pump n.d. direct fuel injection, Common Rail
Injectors n.d. multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. 115,74 MPa
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. Yes, cooling water pump
Cooler Yes Yes, with fan
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. friction, multi-plate clutch, double disc, dry, with independent PTO control, two-stage clutch

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - turbocharger

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Turbocharger No Yes (Turbo Diesel engine)
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable Yes
Aftercooler Not applicable Yes
Wastegate valve Not applicable Yes
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters air-cooled turbine,

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - electronics

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 2
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. Deutz
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. Yes
Cock lamp No Yes

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - PTO

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO min 540 rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - brakes

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
ABS No No
Brake assist No Yes, brakes with assist
Braking system n.d. mechanical
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic, pneumatic, independent, external brakes
Discs Single Single

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - dimensions

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Weight from 3637 kg to 4669 kg (depending by model) from 3690 kg to 4160 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 3690 kg
Length n.d. 4240 mm
Height n.d. 2750 mm
Width n.d. 2020 mm
Clearance n.d. 375 mm
Rear clearance n.d. 355 mm
Front track width n.d. from 1570 mm to 1730 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1448 mm to 1916 mm
Wheelbase 2280 mm 2280 mm
Front tires 10-16 11.2 R24
Rear tires n.d. 16.9 R30
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. 7000 kg
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - drive

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x4, 4WD, Carraro 4x4 (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential n.d. electrohydraulic locking differential
Steering rod servomechanism
Front rods n.d. Yes
Rear planetary drives n.d. Yes
Front planetary drives n.d. Yes

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - hydraulics

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Three-point hitch n.d. 3100 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. EHR, adjustable draft and positional
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 50 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. 18 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed No Yes
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No Yes
Control system n.d. flow-compensated
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. Yes
Quick couplings n.d. 2
Auto Lift n.d. No

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - transmission

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes, partial synchronized
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a Yes
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No Yes, mechanical reverse
Additional Reversing mechanism (mechanical)
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 12 12
Reverse gears 4 12
Creeper n.d. No

Massey Ferguson 690 vs Ursus C-385A - equipment

Specs Massey Ferguson 690 Ursus C-385A
Clevis Yes (???) Yes
Lower catch n.d. Yes, adjustable catch
Air conditioning n.d. Heating