Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - compare

Compare tractors: Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 compare - general information

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Brand Ursus Zetor
Model Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Series C n.d.
Previous model Ursus C-360-3P
Next model
Smaller Ursus C-360 ('15)
Larger Ursus C-3110 Zetor 8540
Years from 2015 y. from 1995 to 1999 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Ursus C-385A reviews New! Zetor 7540 reviews New!

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - performance

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Maximum power (HP / kW) 85 KM (62 kW) 71 KM (52.9 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption 220 g/kWh ( rpm) n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 120 l. n.d.
Max. speed 40 km / h n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - engine

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Deutz Zetor
Engine model Deutz TDC 3.6 EURO III B Zetor Z 7801
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3,6 l. 4.2 l.
Strokes, qty 4 n.d.
Cylinders 4 4
Compression 18:1 n.d.
Bore 98 mm 105 mm
Stroke 120 mm 120 mm
Maximum torque 358 Nm / 1600 rpm n.d.
Air filter dry air filter, two-stage, sensor contamination n.d.
Fuel filter n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty 2 n.d.
Oil filter line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4 n.d.
Oil pump gear pump n.d.
Speed control (control) mechanical n.d.
Injection pump direct fuel injection, Common Rail n.d.
Injectors multi holes injector n.d.
Injection pressure 115,74 MPa n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling Yes, cooling water pump n.d.
Cooler Yes, with fan Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch friction, multi-plate clutch, double disc, dry, with independent PTO control, two-stage clutch n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - turbocharger

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Turbocharger Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler Yes Not applicable
Aftercooler Yes Not applicable
Wastegate valve Yes Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters air-cooled turbine,

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - electronics

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V 12 V
Battery, qty 2 1
Charging system Alternator Alternator
Charging system producer Deutz n.d.
Ignition Electric Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp Yes n.d.
Cock lamp Yes No

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - PTO

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
PTO min 540 rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - brakes

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
ABS No No
Brake assist Yes, brakes with assist No
Braking system mechanical n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic, pneumatic, independent, external brakes disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic
Discs Single Single

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - dimensions

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Weight from 3690 kg to 4160 kg (depending by model) from 3671 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 3690 kg n.d.
Length 4240 mm 3899 mm
Height 2750 mm n.d.
Width 2020 mm 1928 mm
Clearance 375 mm 371 mm
Rear clearance 355 mm n.d.
Front track width from 1570 mm to 1730 mm n.d.
Rear track width from 1448 mm to 1916 mm from 1501 mm to 1801 mm
Wheelbase 2280 mm 2370 mm
Front tires 11.2 R24 7.50-20
Rear tires 16.9 R30 n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight 7000 kg n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - drive

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Drive system 4x4, 4WD, Carraro 4x4 (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential electrohydraulic locking differential n.d.
Steering servomechanism rod
Front rods Yes n.d.
Rear planetary drives Yes n.d.
Front planetary drives Yes n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - hydraulics

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Three-point hitch 3100 kg n.d.
Three-point hitch type EHR, adjustable draft and positional n.d.
Three-point hitch performance 50 l / min n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure 18 MPa n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed Yes n.d.
Central Yes No
Constant flow Yes Yes
Constant pressure Yes No
Control system flow-compensated n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor Yes n.d.
Quick couplings 2 n.d.
Auto Lift No n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - transmission

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Synchronous transmission Yes, partial synchronized n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized Yes n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle Yes, mechanical reverse No
Additional Reversing mechanism (mechanical)
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 12 18
Reverse gears 12 6
Creeper No n.d.

Ursus C-385A vs Zetor 7540 - equipment

Specs Ursus C-385A Zetor 7540
Clevis Yes Yes (???)
Lower catch Yes, adjustable catch n.d.
Air conditioning Heating n.d.