Remember! Writing review of the Renault 486 tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Renault 486 tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Renault 486 tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Renault 486 motor is not strong enough, diesel, higher than average engine capacity, average drive unit but effective, it provides a decent ratio of the performance of the costs, falls well if we compare costs and performance, remember, however, that 3 cylinders are always lower engine operating culture, perfectly matched the rated speed, lighting rather typical, very good PTO, brake without power, disc, dry, fairly light, necessarily on a large farm and certainly not on difficult terrain, quite long, bulky, 4-wheel-drive, front drive axle, power transmitted and shared dynamically on both axles, hydrostatic control, no synchronization in a box, typical number of gears forward, racing in the back of very limited AGRIster |