Remember! Writing review of the Ursus 3724 Piko tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus 3724 Piko tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus 3724 Piko tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus 3724 Piko motor medium power, rather small fuel tank, speed satisfactory, fuel system and the unit deserve the award, higher than average engine capacity, unit average although effective, guarantees a good balance between performance and cost, falls well if we compare costs and performance, or 3 cylinders, however, not too little (???), good compression, engine torque average, nominal turnover work on an ideal level, fuel injected directly, injectors rather typical, linkage with a large range of adjustment, hydraulic performance, starter 12V, large battery 24V, charging alternator, lighting rather typical, brake without power, medium heavy, quite long, large-sized tractor, wheels set wide apart, a good 4WD, with dynamic power distribution between the axles, capacity three-point linkage area. 2 tons, hydraulic performance average, not very efficient pump, transmission without synchronization AGRIster |