Remember! Writing review of the Ursus 5312 tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus 5312 tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus 5312 tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus 5312 engine power wystrczająca, Fuel tank capacity rather average, speed satisfactory, great advantage is the individual and fuel system, big powerful engine, effective but still average (typical) unit, good value and performance for the price and costs, falls well if we compare costs and performance, engine four, 4-cylinder engine, Torque very high, perfectly matched Rated RPM engine operation, the construction of the air filter is excellent for, direct injection, traditional injectors, pretty average and typical injection pressure, classic clutch, run dry, the independent PTO, very good linkage with a large range of adjustment, hydraulics do not fully meet the expectations, pressure too high, 12 V-oltowy starter, 6V, charging alternator, well equipped with electrically, very good PTO, plumbing, no emergency brake assist, disc, wet work, too heavy, a rather large and rather long, wide stance, clearance rather Usually, traditional 2 wheel drive, hydrostatic control, differential lock, planetary final drives on the front, Automatic Differential, capacity three-point linkage area. 2 tons, lift with adjustable force / position, rather not very efficient hydraulics, hydraulic pump average, compensation pressure and flow, one connector remotes, gearbox with synchro, typical number of gears forward, average number of gears back, creeper AGRIster |