Remember! Writing review of the Ursus C-3102 tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus C-3102 tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus C-3102 tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus C-3102 strong unit, Fuel tank capacity rather average, very fast, fuel system and the unit deserve the award, really big and powerful engine, average drive unit but effective, it provides a decent ratio of the performance of the costs, performs well if we compare costs and capabilities, 4-stroke engine, four cylinders (classic), compression engine is not an asset, engine with a very high torque, nominal turnover work on an ideal level, air filter plus, bezośredni injection, rather typical injectors, average injection pressure, tend to be more elaborate clutch, run dry with independent PTO, very good linkage with a large range of adjustment, hydraulic performance, not very high pressure, motor turbo, interstage cooler air, Aftercooler, 12V typical starter, 6V, charging alternator, complete lighting, very good PTO, plumbing, power brake, disc brakes, wet, multidysk, rather heaviest should not be, large and long, wide spacing, clearance pretty big, 4-wheel-drive, power transmitted and shared dynamically on both axles, hydrostatic control, differential lock, planetary final drives on the back, Electrohydraulics, planetary final drives on the front, Automatic Differential, large capacity three-point linkage area. 4 tons, efficient hydraulics, pump pressure in the hydraulics rather common, hydraulic connectors large amount of external, synchronized gearbox, transmission with power shuttle, a lot of gear to the front of, a lot of gear back, creeper AGRIster |