Remember! Writing review of the Ursus C-350 ('15) tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus C-350 ('15) tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus C-350 ('15) tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus C-350 ('15) not very powerful engine, tank quite small, pretty fast, great advantage is the individual and fuel system, higher than average engine capacity, effective but still average (typical) unit, good value and performance for the price and costs, performs well if we compare costs and capabilities, engine four, 3 cylinders, good compression, engine torque average, perfectly matched Rated RPM engine operation, the air filter evaluated positively, bezośredni injection, rather typical injectors, typical injection pressure, clutch technically falls fairly average, run dry, the independent PTO, very good lift adjustable in full range, hydraulics average for a tractor in this class, not very high pressure, powered by 12V starter, 6V, alternator to charge, very good electrician, PTO plus, controlled mechanical, Brake Assist, disk, wet work, dual, too heavy, quite long, large-sized tractor, wide stance, clearance rather Usually, 4-wheel-drive, with dynamic power distribution between the axles, hydrostatic control, differential lock, planetary final drives on the back, planetary final drives on the front, tonne above the average capacity, hydraulic performance average, average pump, a lot of quick, partial synchronization, transmission with power shuttle, a lot of gear in the front, a lot of gear back, creeper AGRIster |