Ursus C-360-3P reviews, opinions

Ursus C-360-3P: power horse 47 km (34 kw), diesel, engine capacity 2,502 l, 3 cylinder(s), compression 16,5:1, bore x stroke: 91 x 127, engine liquid cooled, pto 540 rpm, closed hydraulic system, forward gears 10, reverse gears 2.

Remember! Writing review of the Ursus C-360-3P tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus C-360-3P tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.

Rate Ursus C-360-3P tractor and write review
Costs
Specifications
Use / Efficiency
Your review
Name
E-mail - e-mail will not be published anywhere
3.48
AGROrank is our rating!

We introduced AGROrank - we took into account more than 60 factors and have issued an assessment of each tractor. We've added to the descriptive assessment, counted and assigned to each tractor AGROrank, thus creating a ranking!

AGROrank is:

3,81
3,51
3,12

Our opinion about Ursus C-360-3P

motor is not strong enough, quite a small tank, pretty good speed, great advantage is the individual and fuel system, large displacement, unit average although effective, guarantees a good balance between performance and cost, profitability evaluate the mean paying attention to good cost to performance, 4-stroke engine, remember, however, that 3 cylinders is always worse working culture Engine, average compression I to the present times, average torque, perfectly matched the rated speed, the construction of the air filter is excellent for, distributor injection, traditional injectors, typical injection pressure, clutch typical for a model of this class, run dry, the independent PTO, lift with good control, hydraulics do not fully meet the expectations, pressure too high, powered by 12V starter, 6V, alternator to charge, good light, very good PTO, controlled mechanical, Brake Assist, drums, fairly light, necessarily on a large farm and certainly not on difficult terrain, quite long, bulky, wide stance, pretty high clearance, traditional 2 wheel drive, differential lock, linkage with the lifting capacity of the area. 1t , not very efficient hydraulics, pump pressure in the hydraulics rather common, hydraulic power, no synchronization in a box, Classical number of forward gears, racing in the back of very limited, creeper

AGRIster