Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - compare

Compare tractors: Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P compare - general information

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Brand Massey Ferguson Ursus
Model Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Series n.d. C
Previous model Massey Ferguson 150 Ursus C-360
Next model Massey Ferguson 270 Ursus C-360 ('15)
Smaller
Larger Massey Ferguson 265 Ursus C-380
Years from 1975 to 1981 y. from 1981 to 1998 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Massey Ferguson 255 reviews New! Ursus C-360-3P reviews New!

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - performance

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Maximum power (HP / kW) n.d. 47 KM (34 kW)
Engine RPM 2000 rpm 2250 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. 236 g/kWh (2250 rpm)
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 70 l.
Max. speed n.d. 25,95 km / h

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - engine

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Perkins Perkins
Engine model Perkins Perkins AD3.152UR (perkins)
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3.9 l. 2,502 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. 4
Cylinders 4 3
Compression n.d. 16,5:1
Bore 98 mm 91 mm
Stroke 127 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque n.d. 165 Nm / 1300-1500 rpm
Air filter n.d. wet air filter with cyclone
Fuel filter n.d. fuel filter with cartridge felt-paper
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. 2
Oil filter n.d. line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4
Oil pump n.d. gear pump
Speed control (control) n.d. mechanical
Injection pump n.d. distributor pump with mechanical divider
Injectors n.d. multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. 18,6 / 17,2 MPa
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. Yes, cooling water pump
Cooler Yes Yes, with fan
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. 11 l.
Clutch n.d. friction clutch, single disc, dry, with independent PTO control, two-stage clutch

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - turbocharger

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - electronics

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground n.d. positive ground
Battery (V) 12 V 6 V
Battery, qty 1 2
Charging system Alternator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. Ursus
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. Yes
Cock lamp No No

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - PTO

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - brakes

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
ABS No No
Brake assist No Yes, brakes with assist
Braking system n.d. mechanical
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, dry brakes drum brakes, dry brakes, hydraulic, independent, external brakes
Discs Single

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - dimensions

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Weight from 2540 kg to 3315 kg (depending by model) from 2056 kg to 2811 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 2409 kg
Length n.d. 3610 mm
Height n.d. 2050 mm
Width n.d. 1800 mm
Clearance 264 mm 440 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1219 mm to 1829 mm from 1350 mm to 1650 mm
Rear track width from 1422 mm to 2286 mm from 1428 mm to 1725 mm
Wheelbase 2080 mm 21720 mm
Front tires 6-16 6.00-16.6
Rear tires n.d. 14.9-28; 13-28
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. 10500 kg
Max. axle load n.d. 37 kN
Max. total weight n.d. 2886 kg
Turning radius n.d. 7,7 m

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - drive

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. mechanically locking differential
Steering rod rod, ball-screw mechanism
Front rods n.d. Yes
Rear planetary drives n.d. No
Front planetary drives n.d. No

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - hydraulics

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Three-point hitch n.d. 1200 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. piston, adjustable draft and positional
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 21,5 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. 12 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. Yes
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. gear pump
Two-section distributor n.d. No
Quick couplings n.d. 2
Auto Lift n.d. No

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - transmission

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Synchronous transmission n.d. No, non-synchronized
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control Yes
PowerShift Yes No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 8 10
Reverse gears 2 2
Creeper n.d. No

Massey Ferguson 255 vs Ursus C-360-3P - equipment

Specs Massey Ferguson 255 Ursus C-360-3P
Clevis Yes (???) Yes
Lower catch n.d. Yes, swinging catch
Air conditioning n.d. No