Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - compare

Compare tractors: Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 compare - general information

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Brand Minneapolis-Moline Oliver
Model Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Minneapolis-Moline G708 Oliver 1600
Next model Minneapolis-Moline G1050 Oliver 1655
Smaller Oliver 1550
Larger Oliver 1850
Years from 1965 to 1969 y. from 1964 to 1969 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Minneapolis-Moline G1000 reviews New! Oliver 1650 reviews New!

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - performance

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Maximum power (HP / kW) 100 KM (74.6 kW) n.d.
Engine RPM 1800 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - engine

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Minneapolis-Moline n.d.
Engine model Minneapolis-Moline Waukesha-Oliver
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 8.3 l. 4.616 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 117 mm 98 mm
Stroke 127 mm 102 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - turbocharger

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - electronics

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - PTO

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - brakes

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes Yes
Brake type disc brakes, dry brakes, hydraulic disc brakes
Discs Single Single

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - dimensions

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Weight from 4853 kg to 8330 kg (depending by model) n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. n.d.
Height n.d. n.d.
Width n.d. n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2520 mm
Front tires 10-16 6.50-16
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - drive

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - hydraulics

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - transmission

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift Yes Yes
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 10 6
Reverse gears 2 2
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Minneapolis-Moline G1000 vs Oliver 1650 - equipment

Specs Minneapolis-Moline G1000 Oliver 1650
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.