Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - compare

Compare tractors: Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C compare - general information

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Brand Belarus Case IH
Model Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Series n.d. Farmall C
Previous model Case IH JX1060C
Next model
Smaller
Larger Case IH Farmall 75C
Years from 1992 to 1996 y. from 2008 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Belarus 572 reviews New! Case IH Farmall 65C reviews New!

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - performance

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Maximum power (HP / kW) 65 KM (48.5 kW) 64 KM (47.7 kW)
Engine RPM 1800 rpm 2300 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - engine

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Belarus n.d.
Engine model Belarus D-242 Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT)
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.8 l. n.d.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 4
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 110 mm n.d.
Stroke 125 mm n.d.
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - turbocharger

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Turbocharger No Yes
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable Yes
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - electronics

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Supply voltage starter (V) 24 V n.d.
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - PTO

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - brakes

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, dry brakes, mechanical disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic
Discs Single Single

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - dimensions

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Weight from 4148 kg to 4729 kg (depending by model) from 2619 kg to 3069 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length 3929 mm n.d.
Height n.d. n.d.
Width 1971 mm n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2450 mm 2170 mm
Front tires 11.2-20 n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - drive

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - hydraulics

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed No n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - transmission

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No Yes
Additional Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 9 16
Reverse gears 2 16
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Belarus 572 vs Case IH Farmall 65C - equipment

Specs Belarus 572 Case IH Farmall 65C
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.