Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Brand Case IH Claas
Model Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller
Larger
Years n.d. from 2003 to 2005 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Farmall 55 C reviews New! Claas Ares 656 reviews New!

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - performance

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Maximum power (HP / kW) 55.76 KM (41 kW) 132 KM (97.058823529412 kW)
Engine RPM n.d. 2000 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 90 l. 250 l.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - engine

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. n.d.
Engine model n.d. DPS 6068 TRT
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3.2 l. 6.8 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. 107 mm
Stroke n.d. 127 mm
Maximum torque 221 Nm / rpm 528 Nm / 1400 rpm
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. piston pump, direct fuel injection
Injectors n.d. multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. n.d.
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler
Thermostat
Cooler type
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. friction clutch, hydraulically, multidisc, wet, with independent PTO control

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Turbocharger No Yes (Turbo Diesel engine)
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable No
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - electronics

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. n.d.
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) n.d. n.d.
Battery, qty n.d. n.d.
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - PTO

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
PTO min 540 rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - brakes

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No Yes
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes
Discs Single

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Weight from 2800 kg (depending by model) from 6100 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 2800 kg 6100 kg
Length n.d. 4726 mm
Height n.d. 2910 mm
Width n.d. 2569 mm
Clearance 438 mm n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 21020 mm 2750 mm
Front tires 7.50-16 / 360 / 70 R20 480/70R28
Rear tires 420 / 70 R30 n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - drive

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. electrohydraulic locking differential
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Three-point hitch 2150 kg 8470 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - transmission

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift No Yes
PowerShuttle No Yes
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting, Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. Yes
Forward gears n.d. 16
Reverse gears n.d. 16
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 55 C vs Claas Ares 656 - equipment

Specs Case IH Farmall 55 C Claas Ares 656
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.