Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Brand Case IH Case IH
Model Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Case IH Puma 180
Next model
Smaller Case IH Puma 170
Larger Case IH Puma 200
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 165 reviews New! Case IH Puma 185 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Maximum power (HP / kW) 204 KM (150 kW) 182 KM (135.7 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 410 l. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. n.d.
Engine model n.d. CNH
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 4.485 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 4
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. 104 mm
Stroke n.d. 132 mm
Maximum torque 774 Nm / rpm n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Turbocharger No Yes
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable No
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
PTO min 540/540E rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. n.d.
Discs

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Weight from 6850 kg (depending by model) n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 6850 kg n.d.
Length 4449 mm n.d.
Height 2985-3040 mm n.d.
Width 2682 mm n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1560 mm to 2269 mm from 1524 mm to 2235 mm
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 28840 mm 2880 mm
Front tires 480 / 70 R28; 540 / 65 R28 n.d.
Rear tires 580 / 70 R38; 650 / 65 R38 n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight 12000 kg n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Three-point hitch 3900 kg n.d.
Three-point hitch type piston, adjustable draft and positional n.d.
Three-point hitch performance 113-150 l / min n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure 21.5 MPa n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow Yes Yes
Constant pressure Yes No
Control system flow-compensated n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift No Yes
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears n.d. unlimited (ranges: - 1)
Reverse gears n.d. unlimited (ranges: - 1)
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Case IH Puma 185 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Case IH Puma 185
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.