Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand compare - general information

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Brand	Case IH	New Holland
Model	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Series	n.d.	n.d.
Previous model	–	–
Next model	–	–
Smaller	–	–
Larger	–	–
Years	n.d.	n.d.
Cab with ROPS	No	No
Reviews	Case IH Puma 165 reviews New!	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand reviews New!

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - performance

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Maximum power (HP / kW)	204 KM (150 kW)	212 KM (156 kW)
Engine RPM	2200 rpm	2200 rpm
Fuel consumption	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel tank capacity	410 l.	330 l.
Max. speed	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - engine

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Fuel type	Diesel	Diesel
Engine producer	n.d.	n.d.
Engine model	n.d.	n.d.
Engine type	Diesel (diesel engine)	Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity	6.7 l.	6.728 l.
Strokes, qty	n.d.	n.d.
Cylinders	6	6
Compression	n.d.	n.d.
Bore	n.d.	n.d.
Stroke	n.d.	n.d.
Maximum torque	774 Nm / rpm	912 Nm / rpm
Air filter	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel filter	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty	n.d.	n.d.
Oil filter	n.d.	n.d.
Oil pump	n.d.	n.d.
Speed control (control)	n.d.	n.d.
Injection pump	n.d.	n.d.
Injectors	n.d.	n.d.
Injection pressure	n.d.	n.d.
Cooling system	n.d.	n.d.
Forced cooling	n.d.	n.d.
Cooler
Thermostat
Cooler type
Coolant system capacity	n.d.	n.d.
Clutch	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - turbocharger

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Turbocharger	No	No
Dual turbocharger	Not applicable	Not applicable
Intercooler	Not applicable	Not applicable
Aftercooler	Not applicable	Not applicable
Wastegate valve	Not applicable	Not applicable
Variable geometry	Not applicable	Not applicable
Additional parameters	–	–

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - electronics

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Supply voltage starter (V)	n.d.	n.d.
Ground	n.d.	n.d.
Battery (V)	n.d.	n.d.
Battery, qty	n.d.	n.d.
Charging system	Generator	Generator
Charging system producer	n.d.	n.d.
Ignition	Manual	Manual
Rear stop lamp	Yes	Yes
Rear agricultural lamp	n.d.	n.d.
Cock lamp	No	No

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - PTO

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
PTO min	540/540E rpm	540 rpm
PTO max	1000 rpm	1000 rpm
PTO control	manual	manual

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - brakes

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
ABS	No	No
Brake assist	No	No
Braking system	n.d.	n.d.
Differential	No	No
Brake type	n.d.	n.d.
Discs	–	–

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - dimensions

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Weight	from 6850 kg (depending by model)	from 13000 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS	n.d.	n.d.
Weight with cab	6850 kg	13000 kg
Length	4449 mm	5347 mm
Height	2985-3040 mm	3140 mm
Width	2682 mm	2446 / 2470 mm
Clearance	n.d.	n.d.
Rear clearance	n.d.	n.d.
Front track width	from 1560 mm to 2269 mm	n.d.
Rear track width	n.d.	n.d.
Wheelbase	28840 mm	27340 mm
Front tires	480 / 70 R28; 540 / 65 R28	n.d.
Rear tires	580 / 70 R38; 650 / 65 R38	n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes	1500 kg	1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes	n.d.	n.d.
Max. axle load	n.d.	n.d.
Max. total weight	12000 kg	n.d.
Turning radius	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - drive

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Drive system	(depending by model)	(depending by model)
Additional
Permanent 4-wheel drive	n.d.	n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels	n/a	n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles	n/a	n/a
Independent Link Suspension	None	None
Articulated suspension	–	–
Crawler drive	No	No
Hydrostatic steering	No	No
Differential	n.d.	n.d.
Steering	rod	rod
Front rods	n.d.	n.d.
Rear planetary drives	n.d.	n.d.
Front planetary drives	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - hydraulics

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Three-point hitch	3900 kg	3785 kg
Three-point hitch type	piston, adjustable draft and positional	n.d.
Three-point hitch performance	113-150 l / min	n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure	21.5 MPa	n.d.
Load Sensing	No	No
Closed	n.d.	n.d.
Central	No	No
Constant flow	Yes	Yes
Constant pressure	Yes	No
Control system	flow-compensated	n.d.
Pump	n.d.	n.d.
Two-section distributor	n.d.	n.d.
Quick couplings	n.d.	n.d.
Auto Lift	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - transmission

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Synchronous transmission	n.d.	n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized	n/a	n/a
PowerShift	No	No
PowerShuttle	No	No
Additional	–	–
Hydrostatic transmission	n.d.	n.d.
Forward gears	n.d.	n.d.
Reverse gears	n.d.	n.d.
Creeper	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand - equipment

Specs	Case IH Puma 165	New Holland T7.210 AutoCommand
Clevis	Yes (???)	Yes (???)
Lower catch	n.d.	n.d.
Air conditioning	n.d.	n.d.

About AGRIster

Agricultural directory (AGRIster) is the base of knowledge, information, and products used or have been used in the agricultural industry. Information published in this catalog specifications and parameters of agricultural machinery i.e. tractors (Cockshutt Golden Arrow, Hart-Parr New Hart-Parr, Custom E, Steyr Kompakt 485, Farmall Super AM, Knudson 220, Silver King 347, Silver King 720). The data come from publicly available sources, from users, manufacturers and distributors and dealers.

We make every effort to ensure that the data published in the directory is correct and up to date, but no guarantee. The data are published as they are without any guarantee its accuracy and are not responsible for its use. The data and specs presented are for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer.

agrister.com © 2013-2024 | Terms and conditions | Terms of use | Privacy policy