Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - compare
Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 compare - general information
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Case IH | New Holland |
| Model | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
| Series | n.d. | n.d. |
| Previous model | – | – |
| Next model | – | – |
| Smaller | – | New Holland T7060 |
| Larger | – | – |
| Years | n.d. | from 2009 to 2011 y. |
| Cab with ROPS | No | No |
| Reviews | Case IH Puma 200 reviews New! | New Holland T7070 reviews New! |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - performance
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum power (HP / kW) | 199.92 KM (147 kW) | 227.12 KM (167 kW) |
| Engine RPM | n.d. | 2200 rpm |
| Fuel consumption | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel tank capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. speed | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - engine
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Fuel type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Engine producer | n.d. | New Holland (CNH Engine Corporat |
| Engine model | n.d. | FPT NEF |
| Engine type | Diesel (diesel engine) | Diesel (diesel engine) |
| Engine capacity | 6.7 l. | 6.727 l. |
| Strokes, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Compression | n.d. | n.d. |
| Bore | n.d. | 104 mm |
| Stroke | n.d. | 132 mm |
| Maximum torque | 927 Nm / rpm | 950 Nm / 1400 rpm |
| Air filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Fuel filter chambers, qty | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil filter | n.d. | n.d. |
| Oil pump | gear pump | n.d. |
| Speed control (control) | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injectors | n.d. | n.d. |
| Injection pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cooling system | liquid cooled engine | liquid cooled engine |
| Forced cooling | Yes, cooling water pump | n.d. |
| Cooler | Yes, with fan | Yes |
| Thermostat | Yes | Yes |
| Cooler type | tubular-plate cooler | tubular-plate cooler |
| Coolant system capacity | n.d. | n.d. |
| Clutch | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - turbocharger
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger | Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) | Yes |
| Dual turbocharger | No | No |
| Intercooler | Yes | Yes |
| Aftercooler | No | No |
| Wastegate valve | No | No |
| Variable geometry | No | No |
| Additional parameters | – | – |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - electronics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Supply voltage starter (V) | n.d. | 12 V |
| Ground | n.d. | negative ground |
| Battery (V) | n.d. | 12 V |
| Battery, qty | n.d. | 1 |
| Charging system | Generator | Alternator |
| Charging system producer | n.d. | n.d. |
| Ignition | Manual | Electric |
| Rear stop lamp | Yes | Yes |
| Rear agricultural lamp | n.d. | n.d. |
| Cock lamp | No | No |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - PTO
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| PTO rpm | n.d. | |
| PTO min | 1000 rpm | |
| PTO max | 540 rpm | |
| PTO control | n.d. | manual |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - brakes
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Brake assist | No | No |
| Braking system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Differential | No | No |
| Brake type | n.d. | disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic |
| Discs | – | Single |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - dimensions
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | n.d. | from 7248 kg (depending by model) |
| Weight with ROPS | n.d. | n.d. |
| Weight with cab | n.d. | n.d. |
| Length | n.d. | 5736 mm |
| Height | n.d. | 2140 mm |
| Width | n.d. | 2334 mm |
| Clearance | n.d. | 398-523 mm |
| Rear clearance | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear track width | n.d. | n.d. |
| Wheelbase | n.d. | 28840 mm |
| Front tires | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear tires | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. mass of the trailer without brakes | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Max. mass of the trailer with brakes | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. axle load | n.d. | n.d. |
| Max. total weight | 13000 kg | 13000 kg |
| Turning radius | 6.1 m | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - drive
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive system | (depending by model) | (depending by model) |
| Additional | ||
| Permanent 4-wheel drive | n.d. | n.d. |
| Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels | n/a | n/a |
| Dynamic allocation of power between the axles | n/a | n/a |
| Independent Link Suspension | None | None |
| Articulated suspension | – | – |
| Crawler drive | No | No |
| Hydrostatic steering | No | Yes |
| Differential | n.d. | n.d. |
| Steering | rod | rod |
| Front rods | n.d. | n.d. |
| Rear planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
| Front planetary drives | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - hydraulics
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Three-point hitch | 3785 kg | 3785 kg |
| Three-point hitch type | n.d. | piston, adjustable draft and positional |
| Three-point hitch performance | n.d. | 120 / 150 l / min |
| Three-point hitch pressure | n.d. | n.d. |
| Load Sensing | No | No |
| Closed | n.d. | n.d. |
| Central | No | No |
| Constant flow | No | No |
| Constant pressure | No | No |
| Control system | n.d. | n.d. |
| Pump | n.d. | n.d. |
| Two-section distributor | n.d. | n.d. |
| Quick couplings | n.d. | n.d. |
| Auto Lift | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - transmission
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Synchronous transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Transmission mechanically synchronized | n/a | n/a |
| PowerShift | No | No |
| PowerShuttle | No | No |
| Additional | – | – |
| Hydrostatic transmission | n.d. | n.d. |
| Forward gears | n.d. | unlimited (ranges: - 1) |
| Reverse gears | n.d. | unlimited (ranges: - 1) |
| Creeper | n.d. | n.d. |
Case IH Puma 200 vs New Holland T7070 - equipment
| Specs | Case IH Puma 200 | New Holland T7070 |
|---|---|---|
| Clevis | Yes (???) | Yes (???) |
| Lower catch | n.d. | n.d. |
| Air conditioning | n.d. | n.d. |