Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Brand Case IH Fendt
Model Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller Fendt 826 Vario
Larger
Years n.d. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 210 reviews New! Fendt 828 Vario reviews New!

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Maximum power (HP / kW) 238 KM (175 kW) 220 KM (161.76470588235 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2100 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity 410 l. 505 l.
Max. speed n.d. 60/40 km / h

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. DEUTZ Power Systems
Engine model n.d. Deutz
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 6.056 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. 101 mm
Stroke n.d. 126 mm
Maximum torque 866 Nm / rpm 1210 Nm / 1450 rpm
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Turbocharger No Yes
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable Yes
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters liquid-cooled turbine,

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. n.d.
Ground n.d. n.d.
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
PTO min 540/540E rpm 540E rpm
PTO max 1000 rpm 1000/1000E rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. n.d.
Discs

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Weight from 6850 kg (depending by model) from 9450 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 6850 kg 9450 kg
Length 4449 mm 5274 mm
Height 2985-3040 mm 3270 mm
Width 2682 mm 2550 mm
Clearance n.d. 513-567 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1560 mm to 2269 mm from 2000 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1970 mm
Wheelbase 28840 mm 29000 mm
Front tires 480 / 70 R28; 540 / 65 R28 n.d.
Rear tires 580 / 70 R38; 650 / 65 R38 n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight 12000 kg n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Three-point hitch 3900 kg 11329 kg
Three-point hitch type piston, adjustable draft and positional n.d.
Three-point hitch performance 113-150 l / min n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure 21.5 MPa n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow Yes Yes
Constant pressure Yes No
Control system flow-compensated n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears n.d. unlimited (ranges: - 2)
Reverse gears n.d. unlimited (ranges: - 2)
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Fendt 828 Vario - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Fendt 828 Vario
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.