Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 compare - general information

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Brand Case IH Ford
Model Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model CaseIH 255 Ford 3600
Smaller
Larger
Years from 1982 to 1986 y. from 1965 to 1975 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH 254 reviews New! Ford 3000 reviews New!

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - performance

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Maximum power (HP / kW) n.d. 47 KM (35 kW)
Engine RPM n.d. 2100 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - engine

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Fuel type Diesel
Engine producer Mitsubishi n.d.
Engine model Mitsubishi Ford
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 1.1 l. 2.886 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 3 3
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore n.d. 107 mm
Stroke n.d. 107 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - electronics

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - PTO

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - brakes

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. mechanical
Discs

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - dimensions

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Weight from 884 kg (depending by model) from 1678 kg to 3147 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. 3226 mm
Height n.d. n.d.
Width n.d. 1626 mm
Clearance n.d. 340 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. from 1321 mm to 2032 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1321 mm to 1930 mm
Wheelbase n.d. 1920 mm
Front tires 5-15 5.50-16
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - drive

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. No
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - transmission

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift No Yes
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 9 8
Reverse gears 3 2
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH 254 vs Ford 3000 - equipment

Specs Case IH 254 Ford 3000
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.