Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 compare - general information

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Brand Case IH Ford
Model Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model Case IH 395 Ford 2000
Smaller
Larger Case IH 485 Ford 4000
Years from 1985 to 1990 y. from 1962 to 1965 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH 385 reviews New! Ford 2000 reviews New!

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - performance

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Maximum power (HP / kW) 43 KM (32.1 kW) 36 KM (26.8 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2000 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - engine

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer CaseIH n.d.
Engine model CaseIH D-155 Ford
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 2.5 l. 2.315 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 3 4
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 97 mm 90 mm
Stroke 109 mm 91 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - electronics

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V n.d.
Ground n.d. positive ground
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Alternator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - PTO

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - brakes

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic n.d.
Discs Single

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - dimensions

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Weight from 2208 kg to 2694 kg (depending by model) n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. n.d.
Height n.d. n.d.
Width n.d. n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2020 mm 1920 mm
Front tires 7.50x16 5.50-16
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - drive

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. No
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - transmission

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Synchronous transmission Yes n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle Yes No
Additional Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 8 8
Reverse gears 4 2
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH 385 vs Ford 2000 - equipment

Specs Case IH 385 Ford 2000
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.