Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P compare - general information

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Brand Case IH Ursus
Model Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Series n.d. C
Previous model Ursus C-360
Next model Ursus C-360 ('15)
Smaller
Larger Ursus C-380
Years from 1994 to 2004 y. from 1981 to 1998 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH CS 75 reviews New! Ursus C-360-3P reviews New!

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - performance

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Maximum power (HP / kW) 75 KM (55.9 kW) 47 KM (34 kW)
Engine RPM 2300 rpm 2250 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. 236 g/kWh (2250 rpm)
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 70 l.
Max. speed n.d. 25,95 km / h

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - engine

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer MWM Perkins
Engine model MWM 301.88 Perkins AD3.152UR (perkins)
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3.1 l. 2,502 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. 4
Cylinders 3 3
Compression n.d. 16,5:1
Bore 108 mm 91 mm
Stroke 120 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque n.d. 165 Nm / 1300-1500 rpm
Air filter n.d. wet air filter with cyclone
Fuel filter n.d. fuel filter with cartridge felt-paper
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. 2
Oil filter n.d. line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4
Oil pump n.d. gear pump
Speed control (control) n.d. mechanical
Injection pump n.d. distributor pump with mechanical divider
Injectors n.d. multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. 18,6 / 17,2 MPa
Cooling system n.d. liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. Yes, cooling water pump
Cooler Yes, with fan
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. 11 l.
Clutch n.d. friction clutch, single disc, dry, with independent PTO control, two-stage clutch

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - turbocharger

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Turbocharger Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler No Not applicable
Aftercooler No Not applicable
Wastegate valve No Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - electronics

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground n.d. positive ground
Battery (V) n.d. 6 V
Battery, qty n.d. 2
Charging system Generator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. Ursus
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. Yes
Cock lamp No No

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - PTO

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
PTO rpm 430 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - brakes

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
ABS No No
Brake assist No Yes, brakes with assist
Braking system n.d. mechanical
Differential No No
Brake type disc brakes drum brakes, dry brakes, hydraulic, independent, external brakes
Discs Single

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - dimensions

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Weight n.d. from 2056 kg to 2811 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 2409 kg
Length 3790 mm 3610 mm
Height 2499 mm 2050 mm
Width n.d. 1800 mm
Clearance n.d. 440 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. from 1350 mm to 1650 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1428 mm to 1725 mm
Wheelbase 2230 mm 21720 mm
Front tires 360/70R24 6.00-16.6
Rear tires n.d. 14.9-28; 13-28
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. 10500 kg
Max. axle load n.d. 37 kN
Max. total weight n.d. 2886 kg
Turning radius n.d. 7,7 m

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - drive

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. mechanically locking differential
Steering rod rod, ball-screw mechanism
Front rods n.d. Yes
Rear planetary drives n.d. No
Front planetary drives n.d. No

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - hydraulics

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Three-point hitch n.d. 1200 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. piston, adjustable draft and positional
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 21,5 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. 12 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. Yes
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. gear pump
Two-section distributor n.d. No
Quick couplings n.d. 2
Auto Lift n.d. No

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - transmission

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Synchronous transmission n.d. No, non-synchronized
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a Yes
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 16 10
Reverse gears 8 2
Creeper n.d. No

Case IH CS 75 vs Ursus C-360-3P - equipment

Specs Case IH CS 75 Ursus C-360-3P
Clevis Yes (???) Yes
Lower catch n.d. Yes, swinging catch
Air conditioning n.d. No