Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Brand Case IH Massey Ferguson
Model Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model Case IH JX1095N Massey Ferguson 471
Next model
Smaller Case IH Farmall 75N Massey Ferguson 563
Larger Massey Ferguson 583
Years n.d. from 2006 to 2010 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Farmall 95N reviews New! Massey Ferguson 573 reviews New!

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - performance

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Maximum power (HP / kW) 95 KM (70.8 kW) n.d.
Engine RPM n.d. 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - engine

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Fuel type Diesel
Engine producer n.d. n.d.
Engine model turbocharged intercooleddiesel Perkins 1104C-44
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3.9 l. 4.398 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 4 4
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm 105 mm
Stroke 115 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Turbocharger No No
Dual turbocharger Not applicable Not applicable
Intercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Aftercooler Not applicable Not applicable
Wastegate valve Not applicable Not applicable
Variable geometry Not applicable Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - electronics

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - PTO

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
PTO rpm n.d. 540 rpm
PTO control n.d. manual

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - brakes

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic, independent
Discs Single

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Weight n.d. from 2530 kg to 3319 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length n.d. 3589 mm
Height n.d. 2601 mm
Width 1356 mm 2009 mm
Clearance n.d. 376 mm
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase n.d. 2290 mm
Front tires n.d. n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - drive

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x2, 2WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. No
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - transmission

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Synchronous transmission Yes n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle Yes No
Additional Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 32 8
Reverse gears 16 2
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Farmall 95N vs Massey Ferguson 573 - equipment

Specs Case IH Farmall 95N Massey Ferguson 573
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.