Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - compare

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand compare - general information

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Brand	Case IH	New Holland
Model	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Series	n.d.	n.d.
Previous model	–	–
Next model	–	–
Smaller	–	–
Larger	Case IH Puma 145	–
Years	n.d.	n.d.
Cab with ROPS	No	No
Reviews	Case IH Puma 130 reviews New!	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand reviews New!

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - performance

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Maximum power (HP / kW)	130 KM (96.9 kW)	171 KM (126 kW)
Engine RPM	2200 rpm	2200 rpm
Fuel consumption	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel tank capacity	n.d.	270 / 330 l.
Max. speed	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - engine

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Fuel type		Diesel
Engine producer	n.d.	n.d.
Engine model	Diesel z turbodoładowaniem	n.d.
Engine type		Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity	6.727 l.	6.728 l.
Strokes, qty	n.d.	n.d.
Cylinders	6	6
Compression	n.d.	n.d.
Bore	104 mm	n.d.
Stroke	132 mm	n.d.
Maximum torque	n.d.	741 Nm / rpm
Air filter	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel filter	n.d.	n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty	n.d.	n.d.
Oil filter	n.d.	n.d.
Oil pump	n.d.	n.d.
Speed control (control)	n.d.	n.d.
Injection pump	n.d.	n.d.
Injectors	n.d.	n.d.
Injection pressure	n.d.	n.d.
Cooling system	liquid cooled engine	n.d.
Forced cooling	n.d.	n.d.
Cooler	Yes
Thermostat	Yes
Cooler type	tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity	n.d.	n.d.
Clutch	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - turbocharger

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Turbocharger	No	No
Dual turbocharger	Not applicable	Not applicable
Intercooler	Not applicable	Not applicable
Aftercooler	Not applicable	Not applicable
Wastegate valve	Not applicable	Not applicable
Variable geometry	Not applicable	Not applicable
Additional parameters	–	–

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - electronics

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Supply voltage starter (V)	n.d.	n.d.
Ground	negative ground	n.d.
Battery (V)	12 V	n.d.
Battery, qty	1	n.d.
Charging system	Alternator	Generator
Charging system producer	n.d.	n.d.
Ignition	Manual	Manual
Rear stop lamp	Yes	Yes
Rear agricultural lamp	n.d.	n.d.
Cock lamp	No	No

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - PTO

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
PTO rpm	540 rpm
PTO min		540 rpm
PTO max		1000 rpm
PTO control	manual	manual

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - brakes

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
ABS	No	No
Brake assist	No	No
Braking system	n.d.	n.d.
Differential	No	No
Brake type	n.d.	n.d.
Discs	–	–

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - dimensions

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Weight	n.d.	from 10500 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS	n.d.	n.d.
Weight with cab	n.d.	10500 kg
Length	n.d.	5347 mm
Height	n.d.	3040 mm
Width	n.d.	2446 / 2470 mm
Clearance	n.d.	n.d.
Rear clearance	n.d.	n.d.
Front track width	from 1560 mm to 2255 mm	n.d.
Rear track width	n.d.	n.d.
Wheelbase	2730 mm	27340 mm
Front tires	n.d.	n.d.
Rear tires	n.d.	n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes	1500 kg	1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes	n.d.	n.d.
Max. axle load	n.d.	n.d.
Max. total weight	n.d.	n.d.
Turning radius	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - drive

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Drive system	4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)	(depending by model)
Additional	all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive	Yes	n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels	Yes	n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles	n.d., AWD drive	n/a
Independent Link Suspension	None	None
Articulated suspension	–	–
Crawler drive	No	No
Hydrostatic steering	No	No
Differential	n.d.	n.d.
Steering	rod	rod
Front rods	n.d.	n.d.
Rear planetary drives	n.d.	n.d.
Front planetary drives	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - hydraulics

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Three-point hitch	n.d.	3785 kg
Three-point hitch type	n.d.	n.d.
Three-point hitch performance	n.d.	n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure	n.d.	n.d.
Load Sensing	No	No
Closed	n.d.	n.d.
Central	No	No
Constant flow	No	No
Constant pressure	No	No
Control system	n.d.	n.d.
Pump	n.d.	n.d.
Two-section distributor	n.d.	n.d.
Quick couplings	n.d.	n.d.
Auto Lift	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - transmission

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Synchronous transmission	n.d.	n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized	n/a	n/a
PowerShift	No	No
PowerShuttle	No	No
Additional	–	–
Hydrostatic transmission	n.d.	n.d.
Forward gears	unlimited (ranges: - 1)	n.d.
Reverse gears	unlimited (ranges: - 1)	n.d.
Creeper	n.d.	n.d.

Case IH Puma 130 vs New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand - equipment

Specs	Case IH Puma 130	New Holland T7.170 AutoCommand
Clevis	Yes (???)	Yes (???)
Lower catch	n.d.	n.d.
Air conditioning	n.d.	n.d.