Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Brand Case IH Claas
Model Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller Case IH Puma 130
Larger Case IH Puma 160
Years n.d. from 2003 to 2005 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 145 reviews New! Claas Ares 696 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Maximum power (HP / kW) 145 KM (108.1 kW) 146 KM (107.35294117647 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2000 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 250 l.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Fuel type Diesel
Engine producer n.d. n.d.
Engine model Diesel z turbodoładowaniem DPS 6068 TRT
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.727 l. 6.8 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm 107 mm
Stroke 132 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque n.d. 585 Nm / 1650 rpm
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. piston pump, direct fuel injection
Injectors n.d. multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine n.d.
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. friction clutch, hydraulically, multidisc, wet, with independent PTO control

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Turbocharger No Yes (Turbo Diesel engine)
Dual turbocharger Not applicable No
Intercooler Not applicable No
Aftercooler Not applicable No
Wastegate valve Not applicable No
Variable geometry Not applicable No
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. n.d.
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Alternator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
PTO rpm 540 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No Yes
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes
Discs Single

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Weight n.d. from 6690 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 6690 kg
Length n.d. 4726 mm
Height n.d. 2945 mm
Width n.d. 2569 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width from 1560 mm to 2255 mm n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2730 mm 2750 mm
Front tires n.d. 480/70R28
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. electrohydraulic locking differential
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Three-point hitch n.d. 8470 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Synchronous transmission n.d. Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a No, electro-hydraulic control
PowerShift No Yes
PowerShuttle No Yes
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting, Reversing mechanism
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. Yes
Forward gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) 16
Reverse gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) 16
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 145 vs Claas Ares 696 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 145 Claas Ares 696
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.