Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Brand Case IH SAME
Model Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model Case IH Puma 170
Smaller
Larger Case IH Puma 180
Years from 2007 to 2010 y. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 165 reviews New! Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 reviews New!

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Maximum power (HP / kW) 165 KM (123 kW) 183.6 KM (135 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm n.d.
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer CNH n.d.
Engine model CNH n.d.
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 6.057 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm n.d.
Stroke 132 mm n.d.
Maximum torque n.d. 749 Nm / rpm
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine n.d.
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Turbocharger Yes No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler Yes Not applicable
Aftercooler No Not applicable
Wastegate valve No Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V n.d.
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Alternator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO min 540/540E rpm
PTO max 1000/1000E rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic n.d.
Discs Single

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Weight from 7125 kg to 8039 kg (depending by model) from 6750 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 6750 kg
Length n.d. 4807 mm
Height n.d. n.d.
Width n.d. 2720 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2880 mm 28170 mm
Front tires n.d. n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Drive system 4x2, 2WD (depending by model) (depending by model)
Additional one wheel drive
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Three-point hitch n.d. 9200 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 83 / 120 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No central, closed
Closed n.d. Yes
Central No Yes
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No Yes
Control system flow-compensated flow-compensated
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift Yes No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) n.d.
Reverse gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) n.d.
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 165 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650 - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 165 Deutz-Fahr Agrotron M ProfiLine 650
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.