Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - compare

Compare tractors: Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift compare - general information

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Brand Case IH Claas
Model Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model – –
Next model Case IH Puma 215 –
Smaller Case IH Puma 195 –
Larger Case IH Puma 225 –
Years from 2007 to 2010 y. n.d.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Case IH Puma 210 reviews New! Claas Axion 850 Hexashift reviews New!

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - performance

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Maximum power (HP / kW) 210 KM (156.6 kW) 254.32 KM (187 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm n.d.
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 503 l.
Max. speed n.d. 50 km / h

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - engine

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer CNH n.d.
Engine model CNH n.d.
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 6.7 l. 6.788 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 6 6
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 104 mm n.d.
Stroke 132 mm n.d.
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine n.d.
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes
Thermostat Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - turbocharger

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Turbocharger Yes No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler Yes Not applicable
Aftercooler No Not applicable
Wastegate valve No Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters – –

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - electronics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V n.d.
Ground negative ground n.d.
Battery (V) 12 V n.d.
Battery, qty 1 n.d.
Charging system Alternator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - PTO

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
PTO rpm 540 rpm
PTO min 540 rpm
PTO max 1000/1000 ECO rpm
PTO control manual manual

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - brakes

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential Yes No
Brake type disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic n.d.
Discs Single –

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - dimensions

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Weight from 7125 kg to 8126 kg (depending by model) from 8098 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. 8098 kg
Length n.d. 5721 mm
Height n.d. 3203 mm
Width n.d. n.d.
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. n.d.
Rear track width n.d. n.d.
Wheelbase 2880 mm 29850 mm
Front tires n.d. n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - drive

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes n.d.
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes n/a
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n/a
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension – –
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering Yes No
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - hydraulics

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Three-point hitch n.d. 10229 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. piston, adjustable draft and positional
Three-point hitch performance n.d. 110 / 150 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. 20 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system flow-compensated n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - transmission

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized No, electro-hydraulic control n/a
PowerShift Yes No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional two clutches (dual clutch gearbox), electro-hydraulic clutch control, fast shifting –
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) n.d.
Reverse gears unlimited (ranges: - 1) n.d.
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Case IH Puma 210 vs Claas Axion 850 Hexashift - equipment

Specs Case IH Puma 210 Claas Axion 850 Hexashift
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.