Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - compare

Compare tractors: Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 compare - general information

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Brand Lindner Massey Ferguson
Model Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Series n.d. n.d.
Previous model
Next model
Smaller
Larger Massey Ferguson 274
Years n.d. from 1982 to 1987 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Lindner Geotrac 63 reviews New! Massey Ferguson 254 reviews New!

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - performance

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Maximum power (HP / kW) 64 KM (47.7 kW) 50 KM (37.3 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2250 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. n.d.
Fuel tank capacity n.d. n.d.
Max. speed n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - engine

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer n.d. Perkins
Engine model Perkins 1103 Perkins AD3.152
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 3.299 l. 2.5 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. n.d.
Cylinders 3 3
Compression n.d. n.d.
Bore 105 mm 91 mm
Stroke 127 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque n.d. n.d.
Air filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter n.d. n.d.
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. n.d.
Oil filter n.d. n.d.
Oil pump n.d. n.d.
Speed control (control) n.d. n.d.
Injection pump n.d. n.d.
Injectors n.d. n.d.
Injection pressure n.d. n.d.
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling n.d. n.d.
Cooler Yes Yes
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity n.d. n.d.
Clutch n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - turbocharger

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Turbocharger Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) No
Dual turbocharger No Not applicable
Intercooler No Not applicable
Aftercooler No Not applicable
Wastegate valve No Not applicable
Variable geometry No Not applicable
Additional parameters

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - electronics

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Supply voltage starter (V) n.d. 12 V
Ground n.d. negative ground
Battery (V) n.d. 12 V
Battery, qty n.d. 1
Charging system Generator Generator
Charging system producer n.d. n.d.
Ignition Manual Manual
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. n.d.
Cock lamp No No

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - PTO

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
PTO rpm 430 rpm 540 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - brakes

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
ABS No No
Brake assist No No
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No Yes
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, dry brakes, mechanical
Discs Single

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - dimensions

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Weight n.d. n.d.
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab n.d. n.d.
Length 4000 mm 3556 mm
Height 2349 mm 2400 mm
Width 1971 mm 1740 mm
Clearance n.d. n.d.
Rear clearance n.d. n.d.
Front track width n.d. from 1511 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1397 mm to 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2080 mm 2050 mm
Front tires 365/70R18 n.d.
Rear tires n.d. n.d.
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - drive

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Drive system 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model) 4x4, MFWD, 4WD (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full, front drive axle, mechanical drive, front drive axle
Permanent 4-wheel drive Yes Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels Yes Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n.d., AWD drive n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. n.d.
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. n.d.
Rear planetary drives n.d. n.d.
Front planetary drives n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - hydraulics

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Three-point hitch n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch type n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch performance n.d. n.d.
Three-point hitch pressure n.d. n.d.
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. n.d.
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. n.d.
Two-section distributor n.d. n.d.
Quick couplings n.d. n.d.
Auto Lift n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - transmission

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Synchronous transmission n.d. n.d.
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a n/a
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No No
Additional
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 16 12
Reverse gears 8 4
Creeper n.d. n.d.

Lindner Geotrac 63 vs Massey Ferguson 254 - equipment

Specs Lindner Geotrac 63 Massey Ferguson 254
Clevis Yes (???) Yes (???)
Lower catch n.d. n.d.
Air conditioning n.d. n.d.