Remember! Writing review of the Ursus C-335M tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus C-335M tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus C-335M tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus C-335M motor medium power, rather small fuel tank, speed satisfactory, fuel system and the unit deserve the award, engine small, effective but still average (typical) unit, good value and performance for the price and costs, profitability evaluate the mean paying attention to good cost to performance, 4-stroke, 2-cylinder, average compression I to the present times, or accidentally torque is too low (???), nominal turnover work on an ideal level, the air filter evaluated positively, injection machine, rather typical injectors, not very high injection pressure, typical clutch, large range of adjustment linkage, rather not very efficient plumbing, pressure too high, starter 12V, 6V, charging generator, good light, very good PTO, mechanical control, none BAS, drum, run dry, rather lightweight, necessarily on a large farm and certainly not on difficult terrain, quite long, large-sized tractor, wheels set wide apart, clearance rather typical, traditional 2 wheel drive, differential lock, small capacity of less than 1t, rather not very efficient hydraulic system, hydraulic pump average, one quick, lack of synchronization gears, typical number of gears forward, average number of gears back, creeper AGRIster |