Remember! Writing review of the Ursus C-392 tractor write another of its pros and cons. Write your review on the purchase price of the Ursus C-392 tractor and the costs associated with its use, and servicing. Be as it uses during the harvest and typical field work. Write about your own experiences with the use or the experience of friends.
Rate Ursus C-392 tractor and write review | |
---|---|
AGROrank is: |
Our opinion about Ursus C-392 Average engine power, Fuel tank capacity rather average, very high speed, great advantage is the individual and fuel system, really big and powerful engine, unit average although effective, guarantees a good balance between performance and cost, falls well if we compare costs and performance, engine four, 4-cylinder engine, pretty average compression, engine with a very high torque, perfectly matched the rated speed, good air filter, fuel injected directly, injectors rather typical, typical injection pressure, tend to be more elaborate clutch, run dry, the independent PTO, linkage perfect, a large range of adjustment, powerful hydraulics, not very high pressure, turbo engine, intercooler, Aftercooler, powered by 12V starter, 6V, alternator to charge, complete lighting, PTO plus, plumbing, BAS - Brake Assist System, disc brakes, wet, multidysk, too heavy, long, large size, wide spacing, pretty high clearance, a good 4WD, with dynamic power distribution between the axles, hydrostatic control, differential lock, planetary final drives on the back, Electrohydraulics, planetary final drives on the front, Differential automatically activated, large capacity three-point linkage area. 4 tons, typical hydraulic pump, a lot of quick, synchronization, transmission with power shuttle, a large number of forward gears, gears in the back lot, creeper AGRIster |