Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - compare

Compare tractors: Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 compare - general information

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Brand Farmtrac Ursus
Model Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Series n.d. C
Previous model Ursus C-380M
Next model
Smaller Ursus C-382
Larger Ursus C-3102
Years n.d. from 2015 y.
Cab with ROPS No No
Reviews Farmtrac 690 DT reviews New! Ursus C-392 reviews New!

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - performance

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Maximum power (HP / kW) 87.72 KM (64.5 kW) 92 KM (68 kW)
Engine RPM 2200 rpm 2200 rpm
Fuel consumption n.d. 227 g/kWh (2200 rpm)
Fuel tank capacity n.d. 120 l.
Max. speed n.d. 40 km / h

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - engine

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Fuel type Diesel Diesel
Engine producer Perkins Perkins
Engine model Perkins 1104D-44TA EU Stage IIIA / EPA Tier 3 (perkins) Perkins 1104D IIIA (perkins)
Engine type Diesel (diesel engine) Diesel (diesel engine)
Engine capacity 4.4 l. 4,4 l.
Strokes, qty n.d. 4
Cylinders 4 4
Compression 16.2 16,2:1
Bore 105 mm 105 mm
Stroke 4 mm 127 mm
Maximum torque 368 Nm / 1400 rpm 390 Nm / 1400 rpm
Air filter n.d. dry air filter, sensor contamination
Fuel filter n.d. fuel filter with cartridge felt-paper
Fuel filter chambers, qty n.d. 2
Oil filter n.d. line filter, full flow, type PP-8.4
Oil pump gear pump gear pump
Speed control (control) n.d. mechanical
Injection pump piston pump, direct fuel injection piston pump, direct fuel injection
Injectors multi holes injector multi holes injector
Injection pressure n.d. 24,51 MPa
Cooling system liquid cooled engine liquid cooled engine
Forced cooling Yes, cooling water pump Yes, cooling water pump
Cooler Yes, with fan Yes, with fan
Thermostat Yes Yes
Cooler type tubular-plate cooler tubular-plate cooler
Coolant system capacity 7 l. 7 l.
Clutch wet, with independent PTO control friction clutch, double disc, dry, with independent PTO control

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - turbocharger

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Turbocharger Yes (Turbo Diesel engine) Yes (Turbo Diesel engine)
Dual turbocharger No No
Intercooler Yes Yes
Aftercooler Yes Yes
Wastegate valve No No
Variable geometry No No
Additional parameters air-cooled turbine,

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - electronics

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Supply voltage starter (V) 12 V 12 V
Ground n.d. positive ground
Battery (V) 12 V 6 V
Battery, qty 1 2
Charging system Alternator Alternator
Charging system producer n.d. Ursus
Ignition Manual Electric
Rear stop lamp Yes Yes
Rear agricultural lamp n.d. Yes
Cock lamp No Yes

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - PTO

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
PTO min 540/540E rpm 540 rpm
PTO max n.d. 1000 rpm
PTO control manual manual

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - brakes

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
ABS No No
Brake assist No Yes, brakes with assist
Braking system n.d. n.d.
Differential No No
Brake type n.d. disc brakes, wet brakes, hydraulic, independent, external brakes
Discs Multidisc

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - dimensions

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Weight from 3987 kg (depending by model) from 3250 kg to 3900 kg (depending by model)
Weight with ROPS n.d. n.d.
Weight with cab 3987 kg 3250 kg
Length 4280 mm 4220 mm
Height 2560 mm 2760 mm
Width 1970 mm 2175 mm
Clearance 410 mm 430 mm
Rear clearance n.d. 430 mm
Front track width n.d. from 1580 mm to 1780 mm
Rear track width n.d. from 1595 mm to 1795 mm
Wheelbase n.d. 24770 mm
Front tires 12.4-24 340/85 R24
Rear tires 18.4-30 420/85 R34
Max. mass of the trailer without brakes 1500 kg 1500 kg
Max. mass of the trailer with brakes n.d. n.d.
Max. axle load n.d. n.d.
Max. total weight n.d. n.d.
Turning radius n.d. n.d.

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - drive

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Drive system (depending by model) 4x4, 4WD, 4x4 Carraro electrohydr. (depending by model)
Additional all-wheel drive, all four wheels at all times and it can be used full
Permanent 4-wheel drive n.d. Yes
Permanent systems that constantly power all the wheels n/a Yes
Dynamic allocation of power between the axles n/a n.d., AWD drive
Independent Link Suspension None None
Articulated suspension
Crawler drive No No
Hydrostatic steering No Yes
Differential n.d. electrohydraulic locking differential
Steering rod rod
Front rods n.d. Yes
Rear planetary drives n.d. Yes, electrohydraulic locking differential
Front planetary drives n.d. Yes, automatic locking differential

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - hydraulics

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Three-point hitch 3100 kg 4400 kg
Three-point hitch type n.d. piston, adjustable draft and positional, sensitivity adjustment, adjustable speed control
Three-point hitch performance 50 l / min 55 l / min
Three-point hitch pressure 18 MPa 18 MPa
Load Sensing No No
Closed n.d. Yes
Central No No
Constant flow No No
Constant pressure No No
Control system n.d. n.d.
Pump n.d. gear pump
Two-section distributor n.d. Yes
Quick couplings 6 4
Auto Lift n.d. Yes

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - transmission

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Synchronous transmission Yes Yes
Transmission mechanically synchronized n/a Yes
PowerShift No No
PowerShuttle No Yes, mechanical reverse
Additional Reversing mechanism Reversing mechanism (mechanical)
Hydrostatic transmission n.d. n.d.
Forward gears 24 12
Reverse gears 24 12
Creeper n.d. No

Farmtrac 690 DT vs Ursus C-392 - equipment

Specs Farmtrac 690 DT Ursus C-392
Clevis Yes (???) Yes, adjustable
Lower catch n.d. Yes, adjustable catch
Air conditioning n.d. Heating